Industry regulator FINRA has suspended a former UBS broker for alleged excessive trading in elderly client accounts.
According to a letter of acceptance, waiver, and consent published by FINRA, David Fagenson allegedly “engaged in quantitatively unsuitable trading” in the accounts of three clients, who ranged in age from their 70s to 95 years old.”
As reported in Financial Advisor IQ by Alex Padalka, Fagenson’s trading allegedly resulted in an annualized turnover rate of 16.07 and an annualized cost-to-equity ratio of 31.75% for one client. FINRA generally considers trading excessive when the turnover rate is more than six or a cost-to-equity ratio is more than 20%, according to FINRA’s letter of consent.
The same client’s account “allegedly generated over $260,000 in commissions and markups for Fagenson and UBS and a loss of $283,314 for the client,” FINRA says. In another two accounts that were examined, “Fagenson’s trading allegedly resulted in more than $210,000 in commissions and markups for him and the firm and a loss of $239,000 for the client,” according to the FINRA letter of consent.
“Fagenson consented to an eight-month suspension without admitting or denying FINRA’s findings,” the regulator says. “FINRA opted against levying any monetary sanctions against Fagenson in light of his filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy this March,” according to the letter of consent.
According to Fagenson’s BrokerCheck report, he began his career as a broker in 1987 and joined UBS in 2010. Then, he left UBS in 2016 and joined Newbridge Securities Corporation that same year. UBS discharged Fagenson in September 2016. According to his BrokerCheck report, “The Financial Advisor [Fagenson] was discharged after a review found that while on heightened supervision, he violated firm policy by exercising time and price discretion, texting with clients and engaging in short term trading of preferred shares.”
Roughly two months after his discharge from UBS, Fagenson joined Newbridge Securities. David Fagenson has worked at multiple firms over the years before UBS, including MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED (WEST PALM BEACH, FL); MORGAN STANLEY DW INC. (PURCHASE, NY); PAINE WEBBER INCORPORATED (WEEHAWKEN, NJ); PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INCORPORATED (NEW YORK, NY); and KIDDER, PEABODY & CO. INCORPORATED (NEW YORK, NY).
FINRA maintains a database of investor complaints and disciplinary and employment history for registered representatives and publishes some of this information on its BrokerCheck website, www.brokercheck.finra.org. According to David Fagenson’s BrokerCheck report, he has 16 disclosure events.
Based on our experience, we believe that there are more investors who have been the victim of broker misconduct or investment fraud. If you’ve worked with or invested with David Fagenson, you should contact Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane immediately. Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane is currently investigating David Fagenson’s practices, as well as the products he recommended to individual investors. Concerns about possible broker misconduct and investment fraud are serious, and we are committed to fighting on behalf of investors.
If you believe you were a victim of investment fraud or broker misconduct, it is imperative to take action. Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane has represented thousands of victims, and we remain committed to fighting on behalf of investors. Contact Peiffer Wolf Carr & Kane today by filling out a Contact Form on our website or by calling 585-310-5140 to schedule a FREE Case Evaluation.
securities fraud in the news
PEIFFER WOLF – CORONAVIRUS CRASH TO SEE LARGE-SCALE ABUSES OF INVESTORS SEEKING BETTER RETURNS
We work almost all of our cases under contingent fee arrangements. If we take your case under a contingent fee arrangement, you won’t owe our firm any legal fees unless we are able to recover money for you.
Our contingent fee is either based on a percentage of the amount we recover for our client (which generally ranges from one-third of the recovery up to 40%) or the amount of work we perform on your case, multiplied by our current hourly rates. The percentage we will charge in your case depends on the type of case, when your case resolves, and whether you request us to advance litigation costs (including filing fees, postage, expert witness fees, etc.). Generally, the percentage is higher if we are advancing litigation costs and your case does not resolve early.
In most litigation matters, it is extremely difficult – practically impossible – to predict how long or how many hours will it take to resolve a particular case. Every case is different in terms of the complexity. For instance, a simple breach of contract matter is likely to get resolved significantly faster than a complicated lawsuit involving multiple parties, numerous claims, complex issues of law, and extensive discovery. The other parties’ cooperation, the attorneys’ schedules, as well as the number of other cases on the court’s docket are also the factors.
DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
We handle cases that change lives. Contact us today for a FREE consultation.